Annual Meeting General Call for Papers Peer Review Process - Attend Events
Skip to content
Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn
Instagram
YouTube
Search
Login Communities Publications Calendar About AAA Contact Join Donate Shop Jobs
A blonde woman points to text on a bright green po
A blonde woman explains the text of her poster to

In This Section

Annual Meeting General Call for Papers Peer Review Process

From Our Sponsors

In This Section

Annual Meeting General Call for Papers Peer Review Process

Have you ever wondered what happens to your submitted scholarly session proposal after the general call for papers submission deadline; how the final Annual Meeting Program is determined; or how the peer review process is conducted? Keep reading to find out!

Interactive Table of Contents

Who is responsible for conducting the peer review?

Representatives from each section, known as the Section Program Chairs, conduct the peer review of proposal submissions directed to their respective section. The American Anthropological Association thanks the 2019 Program Chairs who will enhance the AAA Annual Meeting through the volunteering of their time.

Return to Table of Contents

Do all session types undergo peer review?

No. Below are the various submission/session types that undergo section peer review:

Return to Table of Contents

Demystifying the Annual Meeting Peer Review Process

The review process consists of three (3) review “rounds,” all of which are detailed below.

Review round 1:  RELEVANCE

Review round 2A:  Assign INVITED or COSPONSORED status

Review round 2B: BUILD SESSIONS from Individually Volunteered Paper submissions

Review round 3: REVIEW and EVALUATE Submitted and Newly-Created Sessions

Evaluation Criteria

After all three of the review rounds have been completed, the decisions from all three rounds are compiled by the AAA Meetings Department in preparation for the scheduling phase.

Return to Table of Contents

Scheduling

AAA staff do not review or evaluate section submissions, or participate in the section’s peer review process. Once the review period concludes, the top 50% of scores from within each section are given an A-grade; the next 30% of top-scoring proposals are given a B-grade; and the bottom 20 percent are given a C-grade.

In June, the Executive Program Committee Chair and Chair Elect will visit the AAA office to populate the Annual Meeting program in the following order, until the program is full –

Accept/decline notifications are sent to all submitters in mid July, and a preliminary Annual Meeting program will be released in mid-August.

Not sure why your 2019 AAA/CASCA Annual Meeting session is scheduled for a particular date or time?
An executive program co-chair shares their experience.
Click here to read all about it! >>

Return to Table of Contents

Questions?

AAA does not collect or release reviewer comments. AAA encourages interested individuals to contact the Section Program Chairs directly with questions regarding the reviewing of their submission(s).

Return to Table of Contents



You Might Also Like